Follow

Navmii: PQS Summary (2020-06)

Below is a summary of your Publisher Quality Score for the month of June 2020.

If you have any questions please contact your publisher manager at ( datapartnerships@yext.com ) and cc your ops contact: Alex (afernandez@yext.com)

 

Monthly Publisher Quality Score = 4

6/26 = 4

6/19 = 4

6/12 = 4

6/05 = 4

 

 

Week of 6/26 - PQS: 4

New problems:

Outstanding problems:

 

Week of 6/19 - PQS: 4

New problems:

Outstanding problems:

 

Week of 6/12 - PQS: 4

New problems:

Outstanding problems:

 

Week of 6/05 - PQS: 4

New problems:

Outstanding problems:

4 Comments

  • Avatar
    adyhateful

    Could you clarify if there were any minor issues or trends behind the score, even if no “new problems” are listed? Just trying to understand if there’s anything we should proactively address for July.

    Thanks!

    snake game

  • Avatar
    Jessica Spence

    Interesting summary. It’s helpful to see how Navmii structures its PQS approach and how it fits into their broader mapping and navigation ecosystem. It would also be useful to have a bit more context on how these findings were applied in practice.

     

    Snow Rider

  • Avatar
    Theresa Phillips

    Appreciate the detailed summary here. It’s useful to see these publisher updates laid out clearly, especially for anyone managing listings across multiple platforms. Keeping documentation updated like this definitely helps make the process smoother and easier to follow.

    fnaf

  • Avatar
    drownstress

    Without additional context from Yext, the exact meaning of a score of 4 depends on their internal scoring system, but the report indicates that the quality rating was stable across all weeks in July.

    slope 2

Please sign in to leave a comment.
Powered by Zendesk